エッセイの接続表現

I agree. However, there are exceptions.

It's risky; nevertheless, we'll proceed.

It's cheap. Moreover, it's reliable.

Furthermore, the data supports this.

Sales dropped; consequently, we cut staff.

He's late. Therefore, we'll start without him.

Thus, the experiment failed.

In contrast, our results differ.

On the other hand, costs are rising.

In fact, the opposite is true.

Indeed, the data is striking.

For instance, take France.

Three factors, namely cost, time, and quality.

Specifically, we need more time.

In particular, the second chapter stands out.

To illustrate, consider this case.

As a result, profits doubled.

In conclusion, we should act now.

To sum up, three key points emerged.

In summary, the plan is feasible.

Overall, the project was successful.

Ultimately, the choice is yours.

In other words, we need help.

We need clarity, that is, plain language.

Similarly, France adopted the law.

Likewise, Japan saw growth.

By comparison, our model is faster.

He likes coffee, whereas she prefers tea.

While I agree, I have concerns.

Although tired, she kept working.

Even though it was raining, we walked.

Despite the rain, the event continued.

In spite of difficulties, we succeeded.

According to research, sleep is vital.

Regarding your proposal, I have questions.

With respect to costs, we need more data.

In terms of speed, X is better.

Given that he's new, let's help him.

First of all, let me thank you.

To begin with, the data is unreliable.

Secondly, costs are rising.

Thirdly, the timing is poor.

Lastly, we should review the goals.

Additionally, we noticed errors.

In addition, sales rose 10%.

What's more, the price dropped.

Besides, it's already late.

Notably, the response was strong.

Above all, safety matters most.

Most importantly, be honest.

As a matter of fact, I disagree.

To be precise, it's 12.5%.

Put differently, we need more data.

That is to say, the project failed.

In essence, it's about trust.

Fundamentally, the system is broken.

Essentially, both options are similar.

We focus primarily on quality.

The team is chiefly engineers.

Generally speaking, it works.

Typically, projects take six months.

For the most part, I agree.

By and large, the plan succeeded.

On the whole, it was successful.

To a large extent, we agree.

To some extent, that's true.

Conversely, prices may rise.

On the contrary, I love it.

By contrast, sales fell in Asia.

Having said that, risks remain.

That said, we need to act fast.

Even so, we should try.

Regardless, we'll proceed.

Nonetheless, the project continues.

In any case, we must decide.

At any rate, let's move on.

In short, we need help.

To conclude, the strategy works.

As a consequence, sales rose.

He's late, hence the delay.

Plan accordingly.

For this reason, we delayed launch.

Owing to rain, the event was canceled.

Considering the time, we should leave.

In light of recent events, we'll adjust.

In view of the data, we agree.

In response to feedback, we updated the app.

With regard to your question...

As for me, I disagree.

Speaking of food, I'm hungry.

On top of that, it's expensive.

Not only smart but also kind.

He sings as well as plays guitar.

Thus far, results are positive.

Henceforth, all reports must be digital.